Notes: Background on Gilgamesh
An outline of the history of the epic, its themes, and its origins.
GREAT BOOKS
Notes – Background on Gilgamesh
Mr. Reed
- I. The history of the epic
- A. Gilgamesh is the first tragic hero
- B. Modes in which the epic may be read
- 1. As adventure
- 2. As a moral tale
- 3. As a tragedy
- C. Themes
- 1. Morality
- 2. Quest for knowledge
- 3. Search for escape from human limitations
- D. Origins
- 1. Probable oral beginnings: 3000 – 2700 BC
- 2. First written down 1200 BC
- 3. Final recension 650 BC
- a. Library of ASSURBANIPAL (LAST GREAT KING OF ASSYRIA)
- II. The discovery of the tablets
- A. Austen Henry Layard: 1839
- 1. Excavated Nineveh
- 2. Discovered thousands of broken tablets
- 3. Returned findings to British Museum
- B. Henry Rawlinson: 1855
- 1. Began decipherment of cuneiform
- 2. Joined by George Smith –1866
- C. Rassam: 1853
- 1. Layard’s collaborator and successor
- 2. Excavated the actual Gilgamesh tablets
- D. George Smith: 1872
- 1. Announced flood account among the tablets to the Society of Biblical Archaeology
- 2. Went to Nineveh to find the missing lines of the flood story
- 3. Made the flood account (Tablet 11) the most completely recovered
- E. John Punnet Peters: 1890
- 1. Excavated oldest versions of the epic in the Sumerian language
- 2. Only American involved
- A. Austen Henry Layard: 1839
- III. The historical background
- A. Only Assurbanipal’s recension survives extant
- B. Evidence indicates most of the important elements existed independently in older Sumerian literature
- C. Sumerians were the first literate inhabitants of Mesopotamia
- 1. Probably arrived from north and east in the fourth millennium BC
- 2. Irrigated fields and built cities
- 3. Conquered by Semitic tribes in the third millennium BC
- 4. Legal, linguistic, and philosophic influence persisted
- D. The historical Gilgamesh
- 1. Fifth postdiluvian ruler of Uruk (biblical Erech; modern Warka)
- 2. Builder: “Uruk of the strong walls”
- E. Temples
- 1. Ziggurat: holy mountain in miniature
- 2. Served by a perpetual priesthood
- a. Holders/controllers of most wealth
- b. Archivists
- c. Teachers
- d. Scholars
- e. Mathematicians
- IV. The hero of the epic
- A. An historical Gilgamesh did rule in Uruk around 3000 – 2500 BC, most probably within a hundred years of 2700 BC
- B. Records praise his superior (plano–convex) bricks in fortifications
- C. Evidence he was regarded as a great judge (like the Greek Minos)
- D. The literary Gilgamesh
- 1. Two parts god, one part man
- a. Mother: goddess gave him beauty, strength, restlessness
- b. Father: mortal gave him mortality
- 2. The tragedy: conflict between the desires of the god and the destiny of the man
- 3. Parents’ names
- a. Ninsun, minor goddess noted for wisdom
- b. Lugulbanda, god–king
- 1. Two parts god, one part man
- E. Unity among the Sumerian, Old Babylonian, and Assyrian versions
- 1. Profoundly pessimistic attitude toward human life and the world
- a. Insecurity of geography
- b. Instability of religious world view/political situation
- 2. Preoccupation with fame, reputation, revolt against laws of separation and death
- 1. Profoundly pessimistic attitude toward human life and the world
- V. The principal gods of the epic (Read pp. 23 – 30)
- VI. The story
- A. Enkidu’s story
- 1. The Fall in reverse
- 2. Allegory of man’s rise to civilization
- a. Savagery
- b. Nomad taken to and lost in the city
- c. “Noble savage” tempted, winning through temptress’s knowledge that brings only unhappiness
- B. The Cedar Forest episode
- 1. Allegorical levels
- a. Real forest in north Syria or southwest Persia
- b. Scene of strange adventures (sword and sorcery)
- c. Dark forest of the soul
- 2. Historical level
- a. Need of cities for timber
- b. Humbaba’s attributes become the aspects of a volcano
- 3. Quest level
- a. Heroes in search of fame
- b. Humbaba becomes a god – rival to Shamash
- 4. Moral level
- a. Good vs. evil
- b. Humbaba is evil incarnate
- 5. Forest episode as a trap of Enlil’s to destroy Gilgamesh and Enkidu
- 1. Allegorical levels
- C. Glorification of Gilgamesh as king
- D. Taunting of the goddess by a disdainful mortal
- 1. Anchises and Aphrodite – Homer
- 2. Hippolytus and Aphrodite – Ovid
- 3. Picus and Circe – Ovid
- E. Killing of the Bull of Heaven
- 1. Disaster brought on by pride
- a. Enkidu refused Humbaba’s prayer for mercy
- b. He insulted Ishtar
- 2. Quarrel between Shamash and Enlil = sun vs. storm
- 1. Disaster brought on by pride
- F. Death of Enkidu
- 1. Gilgamesh experiences irreparable separation
- 2. Note the inevitability of death results now in a sense of defeat rather than of challenge
- G. Gilgamesh’s second journey
- 1. Topography is otherworldly
- 2. The path is that of the sun
- 3. Siduri is like Circe
- 4. Urshanabi is not Charon
- 5. Dilmun is like Elysium, but is definitely not Hades or Tartarus or Hell
- H. For more see pp. 39 – 44.
- A. Enkidu’s story